 |
A History of the American People by Paul Johnson |
 |
Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography by Iain H. Murray |
 |
Church History in Plain Language by Bruce Shelley |
 |
The Christ of the Covenants by O. Palmer Robertson (and Covenant Theology lectures by Ligon Duncan) |
 |
On The Mortification of Sin (The Works of John Owen, Volume VI: Temptation and Sin) by John Owen |
 |
The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality by Mary Pride |
 |
The Bible Study Hour - James Montgomery Boice |
|
Tenth Presbyterian Church - Philip Ryken |
|
The White Horse Inn - Michael Horton |
|
Chalcedon Presbyterian Church - Joe Morecraft III |
|
Desiring God - John Piper |
|
Reformed Theological Seminary on iTunes U - Free RTS virtual courses |
 |
List View |
 |
Cover View |
 |
Tags |
 |
Author |
A quiz about me just for fun. Let’s see how well you know me. :) When it prompts you for your personal information (just before you see your result), please look for the ”Pass” button and click on it to avoid answering them. There are 20 questions, each is worth 10 points. So the score is based out of a possible 200 points.
 | Rev. Paul Chung: I accidentally saw your homepage and your... |
 | Marieli: That sounds SO beautiful! Thanks for sharing! |
 | John: Thank you for the psalms. It is a blessing to sing... |
 | Jon: Hey I guess I’m new to your blog. I’ve... |
 | Pastor Bruce: Hi Jessica. I enjoyed watching the video by... |
 | Zhey Chua: Hi Jessica, I came to your blog through... |
 | Kevin: Hi, I am looking for good Puritans books to read... |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
A Pilgrim’s Progress | powered by WordPress 2.6.1 | hosted by WebsiteMaven
June 22nd, 2007 at 2:22 pm | Permalink
[...] This should be interesting. I had to post this to get something back after doing so poorly on Jessica’s. [...]
June 22nd, 2007 at 5:29 pm | Permalink
This was fun.
June 22nd, 2007 at 6:12 pm | Permalink
Thank you all for taking the quiz!
By the way, Patrick, as of this writing, you scored the highest. Congratulations, you deserve an award, ha ha.
When you make up your own quiz, I’ll take it. You said you’ll make yours so hard that no one will score even one question correct. Well, we’ll have to see about that. I’d venture to say I’ll score higher than your 130! 
June 22nd, 2007 at 6:48 pm | Permalink
Ah yeah, I am gonna bring it on, and there ain’t no way you are gonna get higher than 130, Jessica! Maybe you’ll get higher than one, but I dunno, I’m gonna do my best to make it Jessica-(and-Charlie)-proof! Muhahaha!
June 22nd, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink
Yee-haw! Here it be!
June 23rd, 2007 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Wow. Will anybody do worse than I did? That is the question that plagues me.
June 23rd, 2007 at 11:59 am | Permalink
Pretty cool.
June 23rd, 2007 at 2:22 pm | Permalink
Hi Jessica,
In case you wonder who is Abel N.
Pls find out from Patrick/Charles’s blog. I left a comment, but still a waiting moderation.
~Abel
June 23rd, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink
By the way, actually, Charlie (aka Charles S.) scored 80 points (not 70). The reason it says 70 is because I had inadvertently input an incorrect answer for one question before he took the quiz. (And Charles C. actually scored 130). I’ve already edited/corrected the mistake yesterday, but unfortunately his score remains the same on the board. Sorry, Charlie. And 80 points is not that bad, though!
June 23rd, 2007 at 7:17 pm | Permalink
Woo hoo! 160. How’s that, Miss Jessica?
June 23rd, 2007 at 7:31 pm | Permalink
Josh, that’s not fair. Nobody should be allowed to re-attempt the test.
I have 3 emails of Abel N. and 9 other emails of different accounts. Imagine what happen if I retake the test another 11 times ?
June 23rd, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink
Hehehe…
Well, actually, the first time he took the quiz, Josh misunderstood one of the questions and he inadvertently selected a different answer than what he intended to. He just clarified that with me. That’s why he re-took the test again…and got one more correct answer than the first time. (I deleted his first score to avoid a double). Sorry for the confusion. 
Wow, Josh, you have quite a high score up there!
Abel, you didn’t do so bad either. Looks like your strategy (you said you selected the ones you dislike) worked out well half the time!
That’s funny, hehehe…
June 24th, 2007 at 7:53 pm | Permalink
Abel the Mystery Man,
No offense was intended by my retaking of the quiz. In fact, I purposefully answered the questions I originally missed in the same manner the second time (excepting the one noted by Jessica, and that for good reason). However, Jessica may do as she deems fit with my score, so long as she\’s content knowing that I think I know her pretty well. She is Princess Jessica, of the Kingdom Blessica, and thus far, I\’m her most knowledgable subject concerning her majesty\’s attributes.
(Disclaimer: The royalty talk is tongue-in-cheek, lest any of you think I don\’t agree with John Knox concerning his sentiments as expressed by his work The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women. By alluding to said work, however, let it be known that I\’m not making any personal accusations against Jessica\’s character, as I\’m certain she\’s a godly lady and is striving to pattern herself after the Proverbs 31 woman. She, also, would agree with my obKNOXiousness. :D)
June 25th, 2007 at 4:58 am | Permalink
Josh, sorry for my wrong accusation. Congratulation for being #1
June 26th, 2007 at 7:46 am | Permalink
Hey Jessica, how come only dudes take your quiz? Does the winner get a date with you to Outback, or what?
June 27th, 2007 at 5:30 am | Permalink
Don, I think your question could also be written as: “Why almost all of your blog regular visitors were male? Why it’s not so attractive to female audience?”
Answer to second part is that Jessica’s blog promote the traditional Godly womanhood, which many modern Christians women disliked.
On contrary what she promoted attract Chistian men who wished their sisters, female friends, fiancees, etc; would learn from Jessica.
I think most of us think of Jessica as sister in Christ, whose ideas we liked.
btw. I believed Jessica is toward ‘courtship’. Which practically means: before someone could take her out, he must first passed at least 100hours+ interview with her dad
July 18th, 2007 at 1:28 pm | Permalink
wow. (to the above comments ). hmm.. well, haven’t successfully completed the quiz…but then again I think we met about a month ago..? so, give me some time and i’ll get back to ya.
God Bless!